Clear The Air Energy Blog Rotating Header Image

Power Plants

The Challenge Of Ensuring Hong Kong’s Energy Supply

Andrew Brandler, Oct 10, 2008 – SCMP

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen’s recent energy deal with Beijing, securing gas and nuclear power supplies for Hong Kong for the next 20 years, is a landmark in the development of the city’s energy policy.

We at CLP Power had been consistently advised for many years that Hong Kong would need to look after its own energy needs as Beijing wrestled with the very real challenge of securing reliable power for the fast-growing mainland cities and provinces. So this deal represents a new, critical development in Hong Kong’s energy policy. This was immediately followed by the Hong Kong government’s statement that the liquefied natural gas terminal project that CLP Power had proposed would not be approved.

CLP Power welcomes Beijing’s support for long-term energy supply. The task ahead is to turn good news into good results and complete the deal on behalf of the Hong Kong people – to secure sufficient gas at the best possible price, and in time for us to replace our declining supplies from the Yacheng gas field in the South China Sea.

It is a measure of Beijing’s good faith in this deal that we have immediately been able to begin detailed discussions with counterparts at the National Development and Reform Commission. But even with this fast start, we are going to face an acute time challenge to make adequate quantities of gas available by 2013.

Hong Kong needs new gas supplies in place then if our Black Point Power Station is to continue providing a significant portion of our power supply, reduce our reliance on coal and enable us to meet lower environmental emissions targets.

As the Yacheng supplies deplete, the deal opens the way to draw gas from three sources: from new gas fields planned to be developed in the South China Sea; from the second east-west gas pipeline bringing gas from Turkmenistan; and, from an LNG terminal to be located on the mainland.

None of these three sources is in place today. However, let us be very clear: Hong Kong’s needs are so substantial that we will need not one or two of these sources to be brought on stream, but all three.

Black Point will be using about 3.4 billion cubic metres of natural gas a year by 2013. In the following decade, as demand for electricity steadily rises and as Hong Kong progressively tightens caps on emissions from local sources, consumption will potentially rise to as high as 6 billion cubic metres by around 2023.

To meet this need, we have been advised that 2 billion cubic metres was planned to come from several new, but smaller, gas fields in the South China Sea to replace Yacheng. If the second west-east gas pipeline can be extended to Hong Kong, we would be able to draw 1 billion cubic metres from this source. With the planned volumes of gas from these two sources, a significant amount of gas will almost certainly need to be sourced from the new LNG terminal in the Pearl River Delta.

Our government’s decision to reject our proposal to build an LNG terminal on South Soko Island means we lose a four-year head start, and face a challenging timetable, as an appropriate mainland site needs to be found and approved, which will involve a rigorous Environmental Impact Assessment.

If we are to meet our targets to ensure power supply reliability over the coming decade, I can’t overemphasise the critical importance of government support and, where necessary, leadership, all the way to completion.

The Memorandum of Understanding is a starting point for meaningful cross-border collaboration in the power sector.

Its implementation and a successful outcome for Hong Kong will depend on the effective collaboration by mainland enterprises with CLP Power, encouraged, enabled and stewarded by our government and the mainland authorities. CLP Power will play its full part.

Andrew Brandler is CEO of CLP Holdings (SEHK: 0002) Limited

Government Gave Power Plant Right To Pollute More

SCMP – Friday October 8 2004

China Light and Power omits certain details in the letter from Daisy Chan (‘CLP has made significant cuts in emissions’, October 6).

Compare the CLP-ExxonMobil coal power plant at Castle Peak to Hong Kong Electric’s most recent Lamma Island coal plant (built in 1997). You will see that CLP has been given the right by Secretary for Labour and Economic Development Stephen Ip Shu-kwan to generate twice the amount of one pollutant (particulates), three times another (nitrogen oxides) and 10 times a third (sulphur dioxide) as the Hong Kong Electric plant.

Moreover, the actual emissions from the Castle Peak plant are kept secret by the government at the request of CLP. At any time since 1997, CLP could have spent a fraction of its profits to clean up this plant, but it has instead waited for seven years – and now it has sent a letter to Mr Ip asking that it be allowed to earn 15 per cent profit on its investment to clean up the sulphur dioxide. This is unconscionable. The Star Ferry only asks seven per cent profit for its shareholders.

And the real question is why Mr Ip has allowed CLP to force us to suffer for seven years when the technology has existed for more than 10 years to reduce the sulphur dioxide by more than 90 per cent.

The public is not allowed to see or have an opinion on CLP’s letter. We believe that we are entitled to know what profits Mr Ip thinks are acceptable to CLP and that he will be hard-pressed to justify more than a seven per cent return for the shareholders of CLP-ExxonMobil, the single biggest polluter in Hong Kong.

CHRISTIAN MASSET, Clear The Air

Clear The Air Meeting with John Tsang Chun-Wah

Meeting with John Tsang Chun-Wah

Consultation on the 2008/09 Policy Address to be delivered by Donald Tsang, Chief Executive.

• Energy :

The recent agreement signed between the HK Govt and the mainland for the supply of gas to the SAR is a welcome step towards cleaning up electricity generation within Hong Kong. (Power generation by gas is 60% efficient and by coal only 38% since gas burns at approx 500degrees hotter than coal).

However Turkmenistan gas won’t be flowing into Hong Kong CLP power station before 2013 at least. Hong Kong Electric (HKE) already has its own LNG gas supply from Da Peng 93 kms pipeline but only has 335 Mwh capacity of gas generation.

China Light & Power (CLP) generated 23% of its output in 2007 by burning 2.5 billion m3 of gas. HKE generated 17% of its output in 2007 by gas.

Until such time as Hong Kong gets a guaranteed stable source of gas supply, CLP and HKE will have to burn more coal to match current production rates. In addition CLP needs to increase its sales to Southern China to help offset the burning of high polluting sulphur fuel by factories currently using their own generators due to a lack of grid supply.

We are aware steps are just now being taken by the two power companies to meet the 2010 targets and reduce emissions due to coal burning through the installation of FGD equipment and NOx burners – however recent research conducted by Clear The Air with what has been already implemented in the US revealed that NOx burners definitely increase the amount PM 2.5 released into the atmosphere since the Electrostatic precipitators in the stacks cannot catch the PM2.5.

It is precisely these PM 2.5 particles that contribute to our bad air quality, reduce the visibility and increase the burden of our healthcare to combat asthma and all kinds of respiratory diseases affecting all including the children. At the scale of the US, and based on published scientific studies alone, the American EPA estimates that the most likely benefits of meeting the revised 24-hour PM 2.5 standards will range from US$17 billion to US$35 billion.

How can we now immediately and drastically reduce PM 2.5 levels and clean our filthy air ? It is by the use of agglomerators – the technology exists it is proven largely in Australia , USA and Poland; CLP would have to install 2 agglomerators per boilers that means 16 in total (15 more to install).

Today, only one is installed. At an average cost of HKD 10M for purchase and installation this means a total bill of HKD 150M, (or 10 days of CLP’s current summer cost for its supply of coal).

Let’s keep in mind that the PM 2.5 are the ultra fine particles that refract the light and cause our “haze” and stay in the lungs for the long term – they are the most harmful ones – the NOx burners cause the soot particles to superheat, crack and break into superfine particles and escape –

What agglomerators do, they charge them with an electrostatic device which causes them to cling to larger soot particles which the precipitators then catch. The agglomerator technology can collect more than 75 % of those superfine particles currently emitted from the stacks of CLP and HKE, They are easily retrofitted to meet with the 2010 emissions caps proposed by the HK Government.

Mr Tsang, the agglomerators are THE answer to the air pollution we will be facing until LNG comes significantly into play.

Meanwhile Hong Kong needs to mandate to use of low sulphur bunker fuel in maritime use here and to consider mandating aircraft run their engines for 2 minutes at half throttle prior to take off to remove the unburnt JetA fuel blasted in the Tung Chung air.

Clear the Air – Meeting With John Tsang Chun-Wah

Consultation on the 2008/09 Policy Address to be delivered by Donald Tsang, Chief Executive.

  • Energy :

The recent agreement signed between the HK Govt and the mainland for the supply of gas to the SAR is a welcome step towards cleaning up electricity generation within Hong Kong. (Power generation by gas is 60% efficient and by coal only 38% since gas burns at approx 500degrees hotter than coal).

However Turkmenistan gas won’t be flowing into Hong Kong CLP power station before 2013 at least. Hong Kong Electric (HKE) already has its own LNG gas supply from Da Peng 93 kms pipeline but only has 335 Mwh capacity of gas generation.

China Light & Power (CLP) generated 23% of its output in 2007 by burning 2.5 billion m3of gas. HKE generated 17% of its output in 2007 by gas.

Until such time as Hong Kong gets a guaranteed stable source of gas supply, CLP and HKE will have to burn more coal to match current production rates. In addition CLP needs to increase its sales to Southern China to help offset the burning of high polluting sulphur fuel by factories currently using their own generators due to a lack of grid supply.

We are aware steps are just now being taken by the two power companies to meet the 2010 targets and reduce emissions due to coal burning through the installation of FGD equipment and NOx burners – however recent research conducted by Clear The Air with what has been already implemented in the US revealed that NOx burners definitely increase the amount PM 2.5 released into the atmosphere since the Electrostatic precipitators in the stacks cannot catch the PM2.5.

It is precisely these PM 2.5 particles that contribute to our bad air quality, reduce the visibility and increase the burden of our healthcare to combat asthma and all kinds of respiratory diseases affecting all including the children. At the scale of the US, and based on published scientific studies alone, the American EPA estimates that the most likely benefits of meeting the revised 24-hour PM 2.5 standards will range from US$17 billion to US$35 billion.

How can we now immediately and drastically reduce PM 2.5 levels and clean our filthy air ?
It is by the use of agglomerators – the technology exists it is proven largely in Australia , USA and Poland; CLP would have to install 2 agglomerators per boilers that means 16 in total (15 more to install).

Today, only one is installed. At an average cost of HKD 10M for purchase and installation this means a total bill of HKD 150M, (or 10 days of CLP’s current summer cost for its supply of coal).

Let’s keep in mind that the PM 2.5 are the ultra fine particles that refract the light and cause our “haze” and stay in the lungs for the long term – they are the most harmful ones – the NOx burners cause the soot particles to superheat, crack and break into superfine particles and escape –

What agglomerators do, they charge them with an electrostatic device which causes them to cling to larger soot particles which the precipitators then catch. The agglomerator technology can collect more than 75 % of those superfine particles currently emitted from the stacks of CLP and HKE, They are easily retrofitted to meet with the 2010 emissions caps proposed by the HK Government.

Mr Tsang, the agglomerators are THE answer to the air pollution we will be facing until LNG comes significantly into play.

Meanwhile Hong Kong needs to mandate to use of low sulphur bunker fuel in maritime use here and to consider mandating aircraft run their engines for 2 minutes at half throttle prior to take off to remove the unburnt JetA fuel blasted in the Tung Chung air.

Gas Plan For Sokos Ditched By CLP Firm Looks To Invest In Mainland LNG Plant

Denise Tsang, SCMP – Sep 12, 2008

CLP Power (SEHK: 0002) has abandoned its controversial HK$10 billion plan to build a liquefied natural gas plant on the Soko Islands off Lantau.

The power company will instead look to invest in an LNG processing plant on the mainland.

“The Sokos project is stopped,” CLP’s commercial director Richard Lancaster told the South China Morning Post (SEHK: 0583, announcements, news) yesterday.

To ensure a secure supply of the clean fuel, CLP wanted to invest in either a regasification plant planned by PetroChina (SEHK: 0857, announcements, news) in Dachen Bay, Shekou , or one planned by China National Offshore Oil Corp (CNOOC (SEHK: 0883)) in Zhuhai , Mr Lancaster said.

It would also negotiate on sourcing gas from CNOOC’s gas fields in the South China Sea and from PetroChina’s planned 4,800km pipeline from Turkmenistan via Kazakhstan to Shenzhen, he said.

CLP had said the LNG project – which involved building a storage and regasification plant on South Soko Island and a pipeline to carry the fuel to the Black Point power station at Tuen Mun – was needed because reserves at CNOOC’s Yacheng gas field, off Hainan , were far less than expected and would run out soon after 2011 at the current usage rate of 2.5 billion cubic metres a year.

Opponents challenged the plan over fears it would damage an environmentally sensitive marine area and lead to higher electricity bills.

The fate of the project was thrown into doubt when Hong Kong and Beijing struck an energy pact last month to guarantee supply to the city for another 20 years, with CNOOC saying that with further drilling, Yacheng, could supply at least 2 billion cubic metres a year.

“We concur with the [Hong Kong] government view that [the LNG plant] is not needed after a memorandum of understanding on energy supply to Hong Kong was signed,” Mr Lancaster said.

The accord, which includes nuclear power supply, ensures the availability of cleaner fuel for electricity generation – and better air quality – and may reduce pressure to raise power tariffs.

Green groups last night hailed the CLP decision.

Angus Wong Chun-yin, of Friends of the Earth, said: “Although using natural gas is good for the environment, building a liquefied natural gas plant on the Soko Islands could have harmed the environment more.”

He said the project would certainly have destroyed an important habitat of the Chinese white dolphin.

But Mr Wong said more needed to be done to switch to clean fuel.

“Dropping the Soko Islands project should not be the end of the story. The Hong Kong government should press harder to require power companies to use more natural gas to generate power.”

Natural gas and nuclear power each account for about 20 per cent of CLP’s fuel mix, with coal making up 60 per cent.

A government source described CLP’s decision as “realistic and clever”. The source said the Environment Bureau would facilitate talks between CLP and the mainland authorities and companies concerned.

Mr Lancaster said CLP would go ahead with a 20-year gas purchase agreement with British-based BG. A preliminary agreement for the gas, originally intended to supply the Sokos plant, was signed in June.

The BG deal would fill a supply shortfall, he said. The Black Power plant could consume 3.4 billion cubic metres of gas per year, while CNOOC would supply 2 billion cubic metres and PetroChina 1 billion cubic metres annually by 2013.

Will HK’s Gas Pipeline Really Clean Our Skies?

SCMP – Sep 05, 2008

It is welcome news that Hong Kong will be getting gas from a new mainland pipeline.

However, the reported volume of about 1 billion cubic metres per year (“More gas for HK in deal with mainland”, August 29) is less than 40 per cent of what CLP Power (SEHK: 0002) is getting from the Yacheng field near Hainan . If CLP is right about Yacheng’s continuing decline, gas supplies to Hong Kong will actually fall over time even with this new deal. In contrast, the proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal would provide something like four times the reported amount of gas from the new pipeline deal.

To meet clean-air targets Hong Kong needs natural gas to replace much of the coal it uses. Natural gas is a versatile fuel used around the world for residential and commercial energy, transport and generating electric power. The more gas we have, the more options we have to reduce pollution. Considering this, the new gas deal should not necessarily rule out a Hong Kong LNG terminal.

We urge the government to provide specific information about the amount of gas Hong Kong will receive under the new pipeline agreement and clearly state whether the amount will be adequate to allow us to substantially reduce (and eventually eliminate) dependence on coal for power generation.

Bill Barron, visiting scholar, Alexis Lau, director, environmental central facility, Institute for the Environment, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Time For Answers Over Gas Deal

Michael Chugani, SCMP – Sep 03, 2008

Something stinks about this whole business of the government signing a gas deal with the mainland so CLP Power (SEHK: 0002) won’t have to build its eyesore terminal on South Soko Island. And the stink is coming from both sides. There are so many unanswered questions over whether or not to build the terminal that it makes you wonder what the big boys in government and CLP Power are up to, and if the people have become pawns.

For starters, why did CLP insist the only way to ensure gas supplies was to build the terminal, which would have meant higher electricity bills for consumers? Was CLP trying to fatten profits? The government has now proved it is possible to buy cheap gas from the mainland using a much shorter, less expensive pipeline. What does that say about CLP’s claim that it had to buy from abroad using a much longer, less environmentally friendly pipeline? To justify its Sokos terminal, CLP insisted that gas from the Yacheng field off Hainan was running out. But the government has secured a 20-year supply from Yacheng. Was CLP trying to dupe us?

Why did the government keep the mainland deal secret all this time and then suddenly spring it on us after it was signed and sealed, yet all the while making us believe CLP’s Sokos proposal was still alive and kicking? Did CLP know about the government’s talks with the mainland? If yes, why did it still waste time chasing the Sokos plan? If no, why did the government sit back and watch CLP chase the plan, knowing it would be dead on arrival?

All these questions need answers simply because the government continues to give CLP a monopoly which allows the company to maximise profits by building more plants.

CLP Upbeat On UK Deal In Spite Of Beijing Move

The Financial Times Limited By Tom Mitchell and Robin Kwong in Hong Kong – September 1 2008

China Light and Power, Hong Kong’s largest energy company, hopes shortly to finalise a provisional natural gas contract with the UK’s BG Group worth billions of dollars in spite of a government agreement that appeared to redirect the lucrative supply arrangement to two Chinese state-controlled oil and gas companies.

In a bilateral memorandum of understanding announced last week by the Hong Kong and Chinese governments, Beijing said it would support the 20-year renewal of existing supply arrangements from China National Offshore Oil Corporation’s gas fields in the South China Sea.

The two governments also agreed to study the feasibility of supplying Hong Kong from China’s second West-East Gas Pipeline, which is being built by PetroChina. Unlike PetroChina’s domestic business, any sale of its gas to Hong Kong would not be subject to government price controls.

The surprise agreement appeared to trump a provisional supply arrangement signed in June, under which BG Group agreed to provide CLP with one million tons of LNG a year from 2013 to 2033. CLP did not reveal how much it would pay BG Group under the two companies’ 20-year “heads of agreement”, but such long-term gas contracts are typically worth billions of US dollars.

However, CLP told the Financial Times: “Even with the gas supplies cited in the MoU, significant quantities of LNG will still be needed to meet our full requirements for natural gas … We will continue working to finalise the sales and purchase agreement [with BG Group] in 2008.”

BG Group declined to comment.

CLP has long argued that it needs new gas supplies because reserves at Yacheng, a CNOOC-controlled field in the South China Sea, are running low. To import new supplies from BG Group, CLP has proposed building an LNG receiving terminal in Hong Kong. The project, which is bitterly opposed by environmental groups, has yet to receive final government approvals.

Speaking after last week’s MoU, senior Hong Kong government officials suggested that CLP would no longer need to build a receiving terminal in Hong Kong. Hong Kong’s agreement with the Chinese government instead proposes the construction of an LNG receiving terminal across the border, in nearby Shenzhen.

But the Hong Kong government did say that any new supply agreements between CLP and Chinese energy companies would have to be “worked out on commercial principles between the relevant enterprises on both sides”.

“The MoU introduces a new possible location for a LNG receiving terminal,” CLP’s spokesperson added. “We will study this alternative and consider the feasibility of using it to supply [our] power station by 2013.”

CLP’s Hong Kong-traded shares fell sharply in response to the bilateral MoU, dropping 3.57 per cent on Friday to HK$63.50, because of fears that the company would be forced to cancel its plans to build an LNG terminal in the territory.

More Gas For HK In Deal With Mainland 20-year Energy Supply Guaranteed

Ng Kang-chung, Denise Tsang and Agnes Lam, SCMP – Aug 29, 2008

Hong Kong and the mainland signed a new energy deal yesterday that guarantees continued supplies of natural gas and nuclear power for 20 years and holds out the prospect of cleaner air and cheaper electricity.

The deal, which took analysts by surprise, also appeared to put paid to plans by CLP Power (SEHK: 0002) for a controversial liquefied natural gas terminal on the Soko Islands, off Lantau.

Under the deal with the National Development and Reform Commission, state-owned gas supplier China National Offshore Oil Corporation will continue to supply Hong Kong with natural gas for a further 20 years.

The city will also receive gas from the nation’s second west-east natural gas pipeline being built to transport gas imported from Central Asia to the Pearl and Yangtze river delta regions.

The deal marks the first time Hong Kong has been included in the nation’s energy supply blueprint.

The 4,800km pipeline is expected to reach Shenzhen in about five years. Hong Kong officials estimated the city would receive about 1 billion cubic metres of gas a year from this source.

The agreement opens up opportunities for Hong Kong companies to invest in natural gas developments in Guangdong.

Under the deal, the China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding Company will renew its supply agreement with Hong Kong for a further 20 years.

Speaking at the signing ceremony yesterday, Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen described the agreement as “extremely good news” for Hong Kong’s power supply and environment.

National Development and Reform Commission vice-chairman Zhang Guobao said: “A stable energy supply to Hong Kong will boost Hong Kong’s prosperity.”

Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah said the main purpose was to ensure a long-term, stable energy supply.

“What is more important is that we do not need to build LNG terminals in Hong Kong any more. So, there will be no more pressure for raising tariffs as a result of investment,” he said.

CLP’s HK$10 billion Soko project had been expected to inflate by an estimated 13 per cent the value of the power company’s net assets, on which electricity tariff rises are based.

The agreement puts a big question mark over a preliminary 20-year deal CLP made with British-based liquefied natural gas supplier BG two months ago for the project.

CLP said it would study the implications for the project, which “is already at an advanced stage”, and study new options. The terminal was designed to replace dwindling supply from Hainan’s Yacheng gas field in 2013.

A government spokesman last night declined to say if the new agreement would kill the project, but added: “The need for that project is greatly reduced.”

Hongkong Electric (SEHK: 0006) welcomed the agreement. Green groups also hailed it, saying they believed it would bring better air quality to the city.

Carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced by 50 per cent when liquefied natural gas is used instead of burning coal to generate power. And sulfur dioxide – a major source of air pollution here – can be cut by more than 90 per cent, according to environmental officials.

EDF And Guangdong Power Firm To Build Two Reactors

Updated on Aug 12, 2008 – SCMP

Electricite de France, Europe’s biggest power producer, has signed a final agreement with China Guangdong Nuclear Power Holding to form a joint venture that will build and operate two nuclear power reactors. EDF would take a 30 per cent stake in Guangdong Taishan Nuclear Power Joint Venture, the French company said yesterday. EDF and Guangdong Nuclear plan to build two European pressurised water reactors in Guangdong, according to the statement.

Areva, the world’s biggest maker of nuclear reactors, and Alstom had signed contracts with Guangdong Nuclear to supply nuclear equipment and turbines, EDF said. The first reactor would start operating at the end of 2013 and the second in 2015, it said. Bloomberg